/en/blog · writing
There are more tools than ever - yet normal hiring is still a difficult task. Why doesn't speeding up processes make them better?
Something strange is happening with hiring.
On one hand, everything has sped up. AI, automation, scoring, a ton of tools.
On the other hand, it feels like it hasn't gotten any better.
We're just making the same mistakes faster.
Even though we all understand it's a weak signal.
ATS screens by keywords. People skim. And as a result, strong candidates easily slip through.
It's good at accelerating, but often stays on the surface:
There are more tools than ever before. Yet normal hiring is still a difficult task.
From both sides, by the way.
But rather that we're still trying to optimize the process, instead of thinking about the outcome.
As long as we evaluate:
we will get the corresponding result.
In fact, something entirely different is important:
And yes, it feels like even in 2026, it's often not the strongest who wins, but the one who best completed this quest called "hiring."