/en/blog · writing
This post explores the shift towards AI-native engineering, moving beyond traditional development paradigms. It delves into how tools like Hermes (memory as infrastructure), DeerFlow (orchestration), Multica (observability for AI teams), and Claude Code workflows (specialized agents) are transforming the industry. The author argues that this evolution changes hiring practices, team structures, and redefines the role of an engineer, emphasizing orchestration and systems thinking over mere coding skills.

You open GitHub Trending.
There you see:
And at some point, a strange thought hits you:
We are no longer automating coding.
We are automating coordination.
In recent months, I've been looking not at "demos," but at the source code:
And there's one feeling:
The market is quietly shifting to a different development model.
Not "developer + Copilot."
But:
AI-native engineering systems.
Let's break down what's truly important.
The most interesting thing about Hermes isn't the "chat."
It's memory.
Currently, almost any team operates like this:
Hermes shows a different model:
AI stores:
Thus appears:
An engineering memory layer
And this is far more important than just another "AI assistant."
The most underrated question of 2026:
How much money does a company lose due to the loss of engineering context?
This is where the real shift in the development model begins.
DeerFlow is not an "agent."
It's an AI supervisor.
It:
And suddenly you start to understand:
Coding becomes just a part of the delivery pipeline
Very similar to how DevOps evolved.
Before: "Admin writes bash"
Then: "Infrastructure as a system"
The same thing is happening with AI.
Most interestingly: Value is gradually shifting:
Not:
But:
This is a very important market signal overall.
When these emerge:
A new problem arises:
Who even understands what's happening?
Multica aims to become:
For AI teams.
And this strongly reminds one of early Kubernetes.
When everyone suddenly realized: "Containers are cool"
And then: "Darn, now this also needs to be managed."
The most important thing here: The market is starting to understand That AI requires:
And this is a huge new category.
This, perhaps, is the main insight.
The strongest systems right now: Are not universal.
But specialized ones.
Not: "One AI does everything."
But:
And orchestration between them.
This is very similar to the structure of a normal engineering team.
And this breaks the old model of evaluating developers.
Because:
An AI-native engineer is no longer "a person who writes code"
But:
This is where it gets most interesting.
Most companies still hire like this:
Although the market is already moving towards:
And that's why a strange situation is emerging now:
A person can:
And yet completely fail in an AI-native environment.
Because the new value is - Not writing code.
But the ability to:
The main conclusion after reviewing all these projects:
We are moving from:
"Software engineering"
To:
"Engineering orchestration"
And this changes everything:
The funniest part:
Many are still debating, "Will AI replace developers?"
While the real question is already different:
Which developers will be able to work with AI systems, And which ones won't.